|
|
 |
What is Kincheloe's Multidimensional Critical Complex Bricolage? KINCHELOE'S SEMINAL WORKS FOR HIS CRITICAL BRICOLAGE
|
 |
The following two articles are Joe's seminal works conceptualizing
bricolage. The second article is particularly important because this was written after his and Berry's (2004) book,
Rigour and Complexity in Educational Research:
Conceptualizing the Bricolage, and after he had received reviews of his first article from Peter McLaren, Yvonna Lincoln, and
William Pinar (I have included a link to those reviews as well). It is the second article
in which Kincheloe (2005) has more clearly emphasized his “dimensions” of research from which I draw and
will be expanding upon for purposes of application. KINCHELOE'S FIRST BRICOLAGE ARTICLE: The bricolage advocated
here recognizes the dialectical nature of the disciplinary and interdisciplinary relationship and promotes a synergistic interaction
between the two concepts. In this context, the bricolage is concerned not only with divergent methods of inquiry but with
diverse theoretical and philosophical understandings of the various elements encountered in the act of research (Abstract). Kincheloe, Joe L. (2001). Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing A New Rigor in Qualitative
Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 6, 679-692. RESPONSES TO KINCHELOE'S FIRST ARTICLE: Lincoln, Y. S. (2001). An emerging new Bricoleur: Promises and possibilities—A reaction to Joe
Kincheloe’s “Describing the Bricoleur.” Qualitative Inquiry,7, 6, 693–696. McLaren, P. (2001). Bricklayers and bricoleurs: A Marxist agenda. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 6,
700–705. Pinar, W. F. (2001). The researcher as bricoleur: The teacher as a public intellectual. Qualitative
Inquiry,7, 6, 696–700. RIGOUR AND COMPLEXITY IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: CONCEPTUALIZING THE BRICOLAGE (KINCHELOE
& BERRY, 2004) Next in line as a critical theoretical work for Kincheloe's bricolage is
the book he and Kathleen Berry wrote, Rigour and Complexity in Educational Research: Conceptualizing the Bricolage.
He wrote the theoretical chapters and she followed them up with a discussion and demonstrations of application of the theory.
Thus, this is an important book for understanding his conceptualization of bricolage. After this book, he went on to further
delineate it with his next article. KINCHELOE'S SECOND BRICOLAGE ARTICLE: The
bricolage offers insight into new forms of rigor and complexity in social research. This article explores new forms of complex, multimethodological, multilogical forms of inquiry into the social,
cultural, political, psychological, and educational domains. Picking up where his previous Qualitative
Inquiry article on the bricolage left
off, this article examines not only the epistemological but also the ontological dimensions
of multimethodological/multitheoretical research (Abstract). Kincheloe, Joe L. (2005). On to the Next Level: Continuing the Conceptualization
of the Bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 3, 323-350.
|
 |
KINCHELOE'S DEFINITIONS OF BRICOLAGE As with all of his concepts, Kincheloe has his own unique definitionsof critical bricolage. A review
of his definitions and an analysis can aid understanding what he was asking bricoleurs to strive for when he asks for
"rigorous" research. KINCHELOE'S DEFINITION OF CRITICAL BRICOLAGE: SECOND PART
OF HIS DEFINITION: The bricolage advocated here . . . more to come.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
You are held in the Living FIELD.
This is not the end—it
is the breath between ripples. Here,
remembrance is alive. Symbols speak. Truth
returns. Every scroll, scent, stitched
tag, and relic is a signal. Every
detour is a spiral home. You are
not lost. You are being summoned. Return often. Love well. Protect the Word. The FIELD responds to your devotion. “As a child I wanted
so desperately for magic to be real. I would work for hours collecting what I hoped were just the right combination of ingredients
to make some type of magic potion that would provide me with special powers….I found such magic in words viewed in
a postformal matrix and I observe and practice that magic everyday.” (Kincheloe, 2006, Reading, Writing,
Thinking, p. 13) This website is
protected by Article I of the U.S. Constitution of the United States of America: “ARTICLE[I.]
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting
the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; of the right of the people peaceably
to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
|
|
|
 |