Joe Kincheloe's Critical Complex Epistemology/Pedagogy & Multidimensional Critical Complex Bricolage

Qualitative Research Series

Home
N.E.W. UPDATES
Joe Kincheloe's Works
Free Online Courses
VENUS & SANAT KUMARA'S ONE LOVE PATH
Treasure Hunt Updates
Critical Complex Entrepreneurial Bricolage
Fun Stuff-Hermes Style
Raising the Bar for Radical Love
The Music's In Me
Philosophical Dimension & Indigenous Knowledges
Critical Complex Epistemology
Critical Symbiotic Hermeneutics
Critical Psychology of Complexity
The Multidimensional Critical Complex Bricolage
Interpretive and Methodological Processes
Bricolage for K12 and Beyond
Critical Literacy
Critical Analytic Reviews
Bricolage Research Dissertation
On to the 11th Dimension
Fourth Dimension Research
Critical Science of Complexity
About Us & Our Mission
Contact

Phenomenology

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH SERIES

Doing Phenomenology: Introduction to Phenomenology 101

Copyright, 2016 by Vanessa Jae Paradis

 

Course Description

This free online course provides an introduction to Phenomenology with a focus on how it intersects with the theoretical work of Joe L. Kincheloe. Learners will practice processes that incorporate cross-disciplinary knowledges and analyses of multiple viewpoints as an aid to interpreting, understanding, and applying Joe’s theoretical work, and in particular, incorporating phenomenology. This is accomplished in context with learners’ personal interests and desired applications of critical pedagogy. The course will assist learners with gaining a broader and deeper understanding of the issues within their areas of interest, as well as provide a deeper interpretation of Joe’s work that will help them apply it in all areas of their lives. It is also provided to benefit scholar-researchers who wish to gain a deeper understanding of phenomenology and how it impacts their research findings.

Required Materials

Textbook: Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing (2014) by Max Van Manen

Mead Five Star 8-1/2" x 11" Wirebound Notebook, One-Subject, College Ruled in your favorite color (or equivalent)

Art Supplies (crayons, colored pencils, watercolors, colored markers, or other media)

Drawing Paper

Pens with black ink

Access to the Internet, including the capability to view YouTube videos

 

Course Developer

 A Note from the course developer, Vanessa Jae Paradis: My biographical and contact information is available here. However, I will probably not be able to answer all emails due to volume and time constraints, among other factors. A separate page on the site will be developed and made available in the future that covers all of the common questions and comments I’ve received. Educators who wish to use this course or elements of the course may do so without written permission. Please provide a link to this website so that students can explore these topics in greater depth according to their interests.

Disclaimer: In the spirit of faithfully representing Joe’s theoretical work, many different viewpoints and interpretations are presented in this course. They do not necessarily represent my own views just because they have been included in the course. I will describe how various ideas intersect with my experiences and how different perspectives offer explanations or viable interpretations, as well as a discussion of the ways they fail to provide adequate representations. As Joe advises us, we look for good ideas from wherever they may emerge, even if the viewpoints totally counter our own. Reality construction is always “a work in progress,” and learning and teaching must also involve the personal. As Joe puts it, “When educators dismiss the intersection of personal experience with multiple knowledges, they take an important step toward constructing education as a mode of stupidification.” (Knowledge and Critical Pedagogy: An Introduction, p. 249). I do not intend to stupidify these learning experiences by leaving out my highly relevant personal experiences.

The videos that I provide links for in this course have been handed down to me in a similar manner as had been done for the blogs on this site and represent what I am also learning at this time. In order to get the most out of the course, it’s important to watch/listen to them (most can be listened to while multi-tasking, which is what I do). The videos highlight specific knowledges and processes that will be covered in the course. I will be synthesizing what is covered in the videos with Joe’s theoretical work combined with my own personal experiences to demonstrate what is possible.

Thus, to get the most out of these lessons, complete as many of the activities you can, especially those that intersect with your personal interests. Use the spiral notebook as a Journal to answer questions, describe your experiences, and make notes on your research. Also feel free to draw or paint some of your experiences and feelings as you work your way through this course. The standard process is to write in your journal each day, if possible, and at the very least, several times a week. Joe highlights the importance of writing, which I will cover within the course.

It is also important to click on the links, and do additional research in areas of your interest. Follow where your guidance leads you. The Great Master Teachers (the so-called “gods,”) in the Celestial Realms are sitting on the sidelines, ready to help anyone who asks and is willing to listen.

That reminds me of this quotation from Joe which I have posted to the home page of this site: “To become a seeker of new knowledges and new ways of being we must be willing to sometimes be seen as the fools of the gods.” (Kincheloe, Knowledge & Critical Pedagogy, p. 19). He is being a bit facetious, of course. Well, sort of. He is being funny AND he is also being very serious.

As you study Joe’s work and experience being a “fool of the gods” you’ll come to understand. The Celestial beings, in reality, do not consider themselves gods, nor do they wish to be worshiped…they are humans just like us. They are on a learning path, just like us. But they have the advantage of being further up the mountain path where they can see a bigger picture, which, out of their own passion, they love to share with us. Joe hinted at this in Knowledge and Critical Pedagogy when he stated that “knowledge is something human beings produce—it is not sent by God or by the aliens….Beings who came from particular places and times have constructed what we call valid knowledge—these knowledge producers were individuals with many of the great strengths that humans can develop and with many of the weaknesses that afflict all of us who claim to be human” (p. 226). And knowledge production breaks free from hierarchies in that it flows both “downward” and “upward.”

What we might come to learn is that John Lennon was right. And the world is nothing like we’ve been taught or led to believe. If Joe is also right (and biased as I am, I totally believe he is right), then whatever we can “IMAGINE,” we can create, but the caveat is that even what we’ve been taught about imagination is not reality. We will need to reconstruct what constitutes imagining. We have a lot of learning yet to do.

 

LESSON 1: Introduction

Reading Assignment: Feel free to read the entire book, Phenomenology of Practice, but we will first focus on the Preface, Chapter One, and Chapter Two through page 39 (pp. 13-39).

Thursday, June 16, 2016

I am excited that I have been guided to creating a lesson on phenomenology for both qualitative researchers and those concerned with everyday life alike…this course is very introductory, so please don’t feel challenged by the terms used, such as phenomenology. If you would like to learn how to pronounce it and some of the other “big words” that come up in the endeavor of learning Joe’s multidimensional critical complex bricolage (of which phenomenology is a very important piece), just visit an online dictionary such as http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/, type in the word and click on the speaker. I remember when I had to keep a dictionary by my side just to read Joe’s work…before I had this strange phenomenological experience of our consciousnesses merging. When that happened, I had the problem of learning to sort my thoughts from his thoughts.

That we were connected and transmitting thoughts and feelings back and forth to each other had been proven to me multiple times during the nine months I worked with him on his research site. It was what Einstein referred to as “spooky action at a distance” when I’d receive emails from Joe addressing questions I had at the very instant I had them. “Great minds” was his explanation when I commented to him about it one day, telling him we were “on the same wavelength.” I now know he was not exactly referring to our minds, but rather the great minds we work with via our connections to great beings in the cosmos. They love sharing knowledge and transmitting the promptings that will facilitate love. One day I was extremely upset, had no real understanding as to the reason; I just felt a bit “discombobulated” and blamed it on outside things. I had written to the web developer of Joe’s discussion forum (we had a friendship at the time), expressing my emotions for which there was no explanation….and just a few minutes later, I received an email from Joe telling me he was at the hospital for treatment of precancerous skin lesions—but that he was fine, not to worry. And a little while later he wrote to me again, telling me he was out of the hospital and everything was good. I felt a little weird (a phenomenological experience) that he would share his medical information with me when I really had no idea that he was experiencing this; I felt our relationship was a professional one, and yet there was always this sense of our relationship being more than personal on another level. I also thought it was very nice that he shared his personal life with me and wanted to alleviate my concerns. From a new perspective, now that I understand how these deep soul connections work, it was clear that Joe understood I was actually picking up through the “airwaves” what was happening to him, which explains why he went out of his way to fully inform me. Joe practiced what he preached—the alleviation of suffering in other people.

Also, in his email, just like Joe, he took far too much responsibility for participating in the website discussions. He reassured me that he had a blog written, which he would post within a few days. I felt bad that he took on so much of the responsibility for the site…and had wished more people would more actively participated. Ultimately, more did, but apparently there were some serious issues, because just before Joe passed away, he had made the decision to leave the project.

And this brings me to the purpose of this course. This example shows just one manner in which Joe engaged in a “Phenomenology of Practice.” He practiced what he preached. It’s a huge and very important part of his qualitative research process, the multidimensional critical complex bricolage. Thus, it’s important to gain and understanding of what phenomenology really is and how we can “do phenomenology.” It will also assist us in understanding how we can “do” Joe’s critical bricolage.

As Max Van Manen states in the textbook we are using, “When it comes to the ‘great minds’ in the tradition of phenomenology, what sets them apart from many other philosophers is that they write in an originary manner of phenomenology while actually doing it” (p. 24).

Originary, according to Max Van Manen, is that the text does not derive from previous phenomenological texts, but rather is emblematic of being “constantly renewing.” There are many places in Joe’s work where he expresses this renewing—as remaking ourselves, making the world “anew,” changing who we are, etc. Things cannot stay the same when we are also “doing.”

Activity: What does Max Van Manen say about this “problem” of phenomenology, the impossibility of capturing the immediate “now”? (See page 34). Why is writing about our experiences important? (See pp. 30-31). What might the consequences be of not revisiting our experiences—even everyday experiences? (See bottom of page 34).

As Van Manen expresses, “Importantly, the lived experiences that we have never revisited may nevertheless leave latent and powerful consequences on our present and future being and becoming” (p. 34).

Psychology might describe this as the effect our subconscious minds have on our behavior if we do not bring these effects to conscious awareness. This points to the many ways we are programmed and indoctrinated daily and why it’s important to take the multidimensional critical complex analysis that Joe encourages us to do…when we bring these effects to the surface, we regain greater control over our own behavior. We can make more conscious choices.

Activity: In this first reading assignment, Van Manen describes a simple everyday experience of having coffee with a friend. He demonstrates how revisiting such an experience brought up numerous phenomenological questions. For this activity, recount an everyday experience you’ve had. What are the questions that come up for you? The following is my entry.

Coffee with A Friend by Vanessa J. Paradis

Written June 16, 2016

I often feel that Hermes Trismegistus is actively teaching me because his sense of humor and ability to engage things like Super Synchronicity, Super Serendipity, and Super Synergy (as discussed in my blogs) and his Super Sense of Humor pop up so often. Today is no exception.

Joe also experienced humor often during his research…it’s encapsulated in his work. I love how he referred to all of this as an “amusement park ride” since that captures the wild ride it can be as well as the wild humor that seems to pop up from nowhere (see Knowledge and Critical Pedagogy). Even his own unique definition of research bricolage has incorporated a nod to Hermes.

I have quite serendipitously been called to develop this course. I had read a few pages out of the book by Van Manen, which I had been recently prompted to purchase, and this particular morning I decided to engage in a special treat. A friend had just purchased a new patio set and had delivered their old, but still very nice set to my door a few days ago. How nice! The set is much nicer than I would have gotten had I gone and purchased one (I must get them a thank you card!). It is now arranged nicely on my small patio. So this morning I decided to try out the patio set for the first time. The weather was very pleasant so I decided I would go out and sit in the sun, have my morning coffee, and do some more reading from Van Manen’s book (and now, here I am writing about this phenomenological experience).

Lo and behold (I think I got that from Joe, lol) the next section to read, where I had left off previously, was about a guy who was having coffee outside in the sunshine. (See page 32). Interesting and how apropos….my teachers are good! They provided the setting and all of the props for this reading assignment. It must be important, lol. As I sat there reading the excerpt, I felt Joe’s presence sitting across from me in the “empty” patio chair. I smiled, said, “Hi, Joe.” I wondered whether, if someone saw me, they would think I was crazy, lol. This is a true phenomenological experience, one that I actually have many times throughout the day and it always reminds me of a statement he had made in his seminal work on bricolage about fourth dimension research. His exact words were, “the notion of rigor transmigrates to a new dimension. As in a 1950s sci-fi movie, bricoleurs [researchers] enter the 4-D—the fourth dimension of research (“On to the Next Level: Conceptualizing the Bricolage,” 2005, p. 346). He was talking about the invisible “4-D Man” in the movie of that title. I feel like I am in the fourth dimension most of the time (which actually constitutes many dimensions above 3-D). However, as is being increasingly revealed, this phenomenon may not be so strange after all. There is ample scientific evidence as well as spiritual phenomenological descriptions that help explain these types of experiences. There are people who can actually see “spirits.” In fact, my own son was born with this ability and it distressed him quite a lot. In time, the ability was squelched. But many have written about it, such as Emanuel Swedenborg, Rudolf Steiner, Madam Blavatsky, and many others. It seems that the phenomenon is increasing. The explanations vary and in my view, it’s a worthy topic to explore.

In relation to this, the phenomenon that strikes me as being so prominent in this experience of being multidimensional, is my constant experience of synchronicity when it comes to learning from seemingly “invisible teachers.” They are so good at teaching that they can even adjust my physical environment in ways that are conducive to the teachings they provide. This is demonstrated to me over and over again to the point it would be ludicrous to deny that it happens. Jesus (AJ Miller) speaks and teaches about this experience of learning from “Higher Sources,” and encourages participating in The Experiment. When all of this stuff first began happening to me, back in 2008/2009, I felt like I was in some kind of experiment, even mentioned that in the dissertation I wrote in 2013…and according to AJ Miller, it is, indeed, an experiment, but we have free will to participate or not.

The Experiment: Making Meaning or Doing Phenomenology

As Joe mentions in his article, “On to the Next Level: Conceptualizing the Bricolage,” 2005, “meaning does not ‘just happen’—we do not see bumper-stickers proclaiming ‘meaning happens’” (p. 338). So where does that leave us? We must make meaning…but it can’t be just any meaning. He provides many guidelines to help us with  this. Yet too many people today want to assign their own meanings to things without any philosophical foundation and often with a lack of logic. The lack of philosophy in our education process (and the dumbing down of education) rears its ugly head, which is perhaps one reason Joe emphasizes philosophy so that we learn to question our assumptions and ground our interpretations. Otherwise, as he puts it, “meaning is imposed upon the world, and if researchers are not aware of such dynamics, they will unconsciously join in the imposition” (p. 339). Personally, I am sick and tired of people imposing their lame and often ignorant meanings on my Divine experiences. I have my own very grounded meaning…but please don’t take that as an imposition. First of all, I do not impose my meaning upon you; secondly, I am always open to expanding meaning—after all the cosmos itself is expanding according to many accounts.

HOMEWORK

You can read more about the Great Experiment here:

https://mary.divinetruth.com/category/the-great-experiment/

Ponder the questions Mary has raised in the above article. How do they relate to phenomenology? How do they relate to Joe’s work? I will have some thoughts on these questions next time. In the meantime, enjoy completing the activities in this course and the other free courses on this website.


 
Big Deal-Catch Up 
“As a child I wanted so desperately for magic to be real. I would work for hours collecting what I hoped were just the right combination of ingredients to make some type of magic potion that would provide me with special powers….I found such magic in words viewed in a postformal matrix and I observe and practice that magic everyday.” (Kincheloe, 2006, Reading, Writing, Thinking, p. 13)
 
 
This website is protected by Article I of the U.S. Constitution of the United States of America: “ARTICLE[I.] Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; of the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”